View this email in your browser

It’s Time to Retire the Word ‘Homophobia’

 by Donald Kilhefner  
(September 2, 2016)

With the blood from the massacre on Pride Day in Orlando barely dry, let me put forth a modest proposal: the word “homophobia” is inadequate and a misnomer, and it needs to be retired.

The term “homophobia” was first coined by Dr. George Weinberg, a psychologist, in the sex magazine Screw, in 1969, and was amplified in his Society and the Healthy Homosexual in 1972. It quickly became the standard term for any act or utterance against homosexuals. But “phobia,” meaning “fear,” belongs to the lexicon of clinical psychology, not sociopolitical discourse regarding social privilege and societal change.

The word “homophobia” trivializes and obfuscates what is really happening to GLBT people in the U.S. and globally, today and historically. It says nothing about the system that that breeds anti-gay violence. It describes an individual’s fear of homosexuals, analogous to a fear of spiders or heights. It says nothing about the dominant intellectual, religious, and cultural superstructure that supports an ideology of heterosexual superiority.

I propose that “homophobia” be replaced by “the ideology of heterosexual supremacy,” or “hetero supremacy” for short. Let me justify the latter term with an analogy. The “Final Solution” in Germany was not based on “Jewish-phobia” but was grounded in an ideology of Aryan supremacy and a theory of racial superiority, which created a category of inferior races that were subject to enslavement or elimination.

The ideology of hetero supremacy has always had consequences for GLBT people—including gruesome death, as in the Orlando Massacre. The litany of horrors committed against gay people historically and still today—whether acts of individual butchery or state-sponsored terror in countries like Uganda or Bangladesh—are united by this ideology. The dominant hetero culture has given gay people what they were thought to deserve: see a cockroach, call the exterminator. Is the word “homophobia” the best descriptor for heinous acts of savagery, which have gone on and on, century after century, all over the world?

Orlando reminded us that these acts of brutality are not confined to Islamic countries or to the distant past. There is a growing, documented history of violence and murder committed by hetero supremacists against gay people in the U.S. Before Stonewall, gays were killed, beaten, and driven to suicide one by one, under the radar of the media and the police. The only difference is that now one man can commit mass murder in minutes.

One simply cannot understand what happened in Orlando or what has happened so often without understanding the theory and practice of hetero supremacy. Otherwise, all you get are people mouthing tired platitudes about the persistence of homophobia. If we want to live in a truly pluralistic society, there is no room for cults of supremacy of any kind.

Don Kilhefner is a writer and activist based in Los Angeles.

Podcast Coming In 2017
"Gay Tribal Elder with Don Kilhefner"
More Information Later

Read At Your Peril

Do you have an intellectual life?  By "intellectual life" I do not mean solely looking at a screen (visual culture). By "intellectual life" I mean read-ing newspapers, articles and books (literate culture).  Ideally, there should be a balancing of both visual and literate culture. Most of us are one-sided in one direction or another. I am one-sided in the direction of reading and need to develop more in the area of visual culture. For others, many times younger people, the imbalance is in the opposite direction.  

Marshall McLuhan, the mid-20th century prophet of visual technology, suggested that the rapid advance in visual culture will result in a more superficial culture because by its very nature visual media is superficial (it also activates a different, non-imaginative part of the brain). Visual culture gives us form.Literate culture gives us content.

How Does One Develop A LGBT Intellectual Life? You read on an on-going basis about LGBT history, literature, culture and politics. The best way to do that is by reading every issue of The Gay and Lesbian Review World-wide. Richard Schneider, its founder and editor, deserves a Gay Noble Prize for his outstanding effort.  

Check out its website at: www.GLReview.orgIf you keep your eyes open, you can often catch a special offer of six annual issues for $24.  

A Mind Is A Terrible Thing To Waste.  Find a young LGBT person under 35 and give them a gift of The Gay and Lesbian Review Worldwide. If you are over 35 without a subscription, whats's your excuse. I promise you, with a subscription to The Gay and Lesbian Review Worldwide you'll find true love. 


You have my permission to reprint and/or resend my essay. Be sure to attribute it to
The Gay and Lesbian Review Worldwide (Sept.-Oct. 2016).

Animae Communitatis Colendae Gratia
(For the sake of tending to the soul of the community)

Copyright © 2016 Don Kilhefner, Ph.D. 

Our mailing address is:

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list


This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
GayTribalElder · 1324 N. Stanley 90046 · Los Angeles, CA 90046 · USA

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp