photo h_zpsj7iwbwea.jpg

As the weather in Michigan swings wildly from mild Spring-like afternoons to frigid Arctic blasts, everyone knows how quickly roads, driveways, parking lots, and sidewalks can become treacherous minefields. Whether you’re taking a quick trip to the grocery store or commuting to work, staying safe in dangerous situations should be everyone’s top concern. Consider an elderly woman leaving her apartment on a wintry morning. A light snow has fallen during the night. A lifetime Michigander, she knows how to walk in light snow, and takes a few careful steps outside her door. The snow crunches under feet familiarly as she gets her bearings. Confident as to how to proceed, she takes another step only for her foot to find a patch of ice hidden by the snow, which the apartment complex maintenance team had failed to salt. She slips, falls, and fractures her leg in two places. The next few months are a welter of exams, surgeries, and physical therapy; and her life is never quite the same again. Should she sue? Can she?

Under Michigan law, negligence actions for injuries sustained in slip-and-fall cases have tended to be frustrated by what’s called the “open and obvious” doctrine. Essentially, a potential hazard is considered “open and obvious” if a reasonable person would notice the hazard and be able to act to ensure their own safety. Thus, if a slippery sidewalk on a cold day with snow on the ground is an “open and obvious” hazard, it becomes difficult to show that a defendant was in some way negligent, whether they could have done more to clear the hazard or not. The argument focuses on how obvious the hazard was, and what was done to eliminate it. The more obvious the hazard, the less a defendant needs to have done to mitigate the risk.

However, Michigan has a statute which requires landlords, specifically, to keep common areas fit for their intended use. (MCL 554.139). Recently, this statute has been used to find a separate and distinct duty that goes above and beyond the common-law duty described above. Thus, even if a hazard were considered “open and obvious”, a claim can nonetheless be made against a landlord who fails to keep a sidewalk fit for its intended use, namely, walking.

This distinction was made very clear in a recent unpublished opinion by the Oakland County Circuit Court in late 2016, (Hendrix v. Lautrec LTD, MiLW No. 08-98135), in which a plaintiff’s claim for negligence was dismissed, but her claim under MCL 554.139 was remanded to district court to determine whether the common area of her apartment complex where she was injured had been “fit for its intended use”. The key factual question was what a driveway’s “intended use” was – more like a parking lot, and its intended use is for cars; or more like a sidewalk, and its intended use is for walking. Whether the defendant breached its duty under MCL 554.139 hinges on that fact – and does so apart from the “open and obvious” doctrine. This distinction provides another possible avenue of relief in slip-and-fall cases.

After any fall, the first concern you should have is for your safety. Is anything broken?  Serious injury may make it prudent to consider whether someone failed to fulfill a duty they owed to you. Your landlord has a duty to keep common areas fit for their intended uses, and their failure to do so has consequences. Consulting with an attorney following a fall can help give you a better idea of what the potential risks and benefits of a lawsuit would be, and can be worth your time and money in situations where the damages suffered are particularly severe. Stay safe out there!

Contact us online or call our office today. Toll Free: 1 (855) TISH-LAW.


Tishkoff PLC is pleased to announce that Sean Taylor will join the firm as an associate attorney on March 1, 2017.  

Mr. Taylor earned his B.A. in Financial Economics at the University of Rochester in 2010, and received his Juris Doctor, cum laude, from the University of Minnesota Law School in 2013. While in law school, Mr. Taylor was a public service award recipient and participated in Maynard Pirsig Moot Court. After earning his law degree, Mr. Taylor did a fellowship as a consumer rights attorney at Mid-Minnesota Legal Aid in downtown Minneapolis. Mr. Taylor then clerked for District Judge Vicki E. Landwehr in Minnesota’s Seventh Judicial District prior to joining Tishkoff PLC.
Paralegal O'Neill's flourishing windowsill garden bringing a little bit of Spring to Tishkoff's offices.
A big Tishkoff win featured in Michigan Lawyers Weekly! See our Verdicts & Settlements page at for more details!
 photo f_zps3akvjzrm.jpg
For Tishkoff PLC updates, follow our social media here:
Copyright © 2017 Tishkoff PLC, All rights reserved.
Designed & edited by Shana Haugh

Our mailing address is:
407 North Main Street
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp